Categories
Politics Today

Loopy CNN Physician Claims Court docket Is Stuffed with Hypocrites on Vax Mandate

At all times one for sounding off like a far-left political pundit, CNN medical analyst and George Washington College physician Jonathan Reiner joined Friday morning’s CNN Newsroom to pontificate on the Supreme Court docket putting down President Biden’s vaccine mandate for giant companies as “shameful,” accusing the Court docket of hypocrisy. However, in actuality, he simply confirmed he does not understand how broad mandates work.

Visitor co-host Bianna Golodryga prefaced her plea by sustaining Reiner is just not a authorized analyst, “however you’re a well being knowledgeable and from that perspective, I would love to get your response to what we heard from the Supreme Court docket yesterday, blocking the administration’s mandate for companies, massive companies to impose vaccines and testing however permitting them for some hospitals that present Medicare and Medicaid assist.”

“I am curious, did that ruling make sense out of your perspective and what’s your tackle it,” she added.

 

 

Reiner instantly determined to affirm Golodryga’s evaluation that he’s not a authorized knowledgeable, as a result of he utterly ignored the half concerning the Court docket permitting one other mandate to face: “No. I imply, I believed that the apparent political leanings of the Court docket have been proven in that resolution.”

Ignoring a number of occasion of misinformation from liberal justices, Reiner lamented: “I used to be additionally struck by the astonishing lack of info as proof by some of the questions posed by some of the justices, notably Justice Thomas, utterly misquoting knowledge and misunderstanding how this virus is unfold and, you understand, the Court docket’s resolution, which principally mentioned that workplaces by and huge usually are not dangerous locations to amass the virus.”

Reiner additionally claimed the Court docket was being hypocritical in its rulings: “You may’t enter that Court docket except you’re vaccinated and examined. So the Court docket has cloaked themselves in protections that most workplaces haven’t got, but they’d withhold that from, you understand, hundreds of thousands of staff in the US. I believed it was a shameful resolution.”

The Supreme Court docket, whose justices are disproportionately older than the common office, has guidelines that govern itself. What that has to do with the chief department making an attempt to pressure personal companies to do the identical is one thing Reiner could not clarify, nevertheless it wasn’t the primary time the physician wandered out of his lane.

This section was sponsored by T-Mobile. Their contact info is linked.

Here’s a transcript of the January 14 present. Click on “increase” to learn.

CNN Newsroom with Poppy Harlow and Jim Sciutto
January 14, 2022
10:19 a.m. Jap

BIANNA GOLODRYGA: I will preface this query by noting the apparent, and that’s that I do not imagine you’re a authorized analyst, however — however you’re a well being knowledgeable and from that perspective, I would love to get your response to what we heard from the Supreme Court docket yesterday, blocking the administration’s mandate for companies, massive companies to impose vaccines and testing however permitting them for some hospitals that present Medicare and Medicaid assist. I am curious, did that ruling make sense out of your perspective and what’s your tackle it? 

JONATHAN REINER: No. I imply, I believed that the apparent political leanings of the Court docket have been proven in that resolution and I will — I will — I used to be additionally struck by the astonishing lack of info as proof by some of the questions posed by some of the justices, notably Justice Thomas, utterly mis — misquoting knowledge and misunderstanding how this virus is unfold and, you understand, the Court docket’s resolution, which principally mentioned that workplaces by and huge usually are not dangerous locations to amass the virus be — counter to what the Court docket has arrange. You may’t enter that Court docket —

JIM SCIUTTO: Yeah.

REINER: — except you’re vaccinated and examined. So the Court docket has cloaked themselves in protections that most workplaces haven’t got, but they’d withhold that from, you understand, hundreds of thousands of staff in the US. I believed it was —

SCIUTTO: Yeah.

REINER: — a shameful resolution.

SCIUTTO: Ariane de Vogue, our Supreme Court docket reporter, made that time final hour that the justices themselves? vaccinated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *