Health Today

Former Pfizer Science Officer Reveals Nice COVID-19 Rip-off

I’ve written a number of articles about scientists and medical medical doctors who query the official narrative concerning the COVID-19 pandemic and the global measures put into place due to it, from ineffective testing, mask wearing and social distancing, to lockdowns, tracking and tracing and the baseless fearmongering driving all of it.

Within the video above, British journalist Anna Brees interviews Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug firm Pfizer and founder and CEO of the biotech firm Ziarco, now owned by Novartis.

In it, he discusses a number of issues, together with his perception that widespread PCR testing is creating the false concept that the pandemic is resurging, as the overall mortality price is totally regular. He additionally discusses his issues about COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

PCR Testing Is Inflicting a False ‘Casedemic’

As I defined in “Asymptomatic ‘Casedemic’ Is a Perpetuation of Needless Fear,” through the use of PCR testing, which can not diagnose energetic an infection, a false narrative has been created.

Presently, rising “circumstances,” which means constructive exams, are once more getting used because the justification to impose extra extreme restrictions, together with lockdowns and necessary masks sporting, when actually constructive exams don’t have anything to do with the precise unfold of sickness.

In keeping with Yeadon, the U.Ok. has now examined an estimated 30 million individuals, or near half of the inhabitants. “A big variety of these exams have been current,” Yeadon says, noting that the definition of a “coronavirus demise” within the U.Ok. is anybody who dies, from any trigger, inside 28 days of a constructive COVID-19 check.

So, what we’re seeing now could be a pure demise price — about 1,700 individuals die every day within the U.Ok. in any given yr, Yeadon says — however many of those deaths are actually falsely attributed to COVID-19. “I am calling out the statistics, and even the declare that there’s an ongoing pandemic, as false,” he says.

He challenges anybody who would not imagine him to hunt down any database on complete mortality. For those who do this, you will see that that the each day demise depend is “completely bang-on regular,” Yeadon says.

For some months, the demise depend is definitely barely decrease than the typical norm over the previous 5 years. And, he provides, “You can’t have a deadly pandemic stalking the land and never have extra deaths.”

Lack of Routine Medical Care Is Inflicting Uptick in Deaths

The slight uptick in deaths that are actually being reported merely aren’t straight attributable to COVID-19, he insists. Information present these deaths — primarily individuals aged 45 to 65, with equal distribution between the sexes — are primarily from coronary heart illness, stroke and most cancers, which suggests they are extra deaths brought on by inaccessibility of routine medical care as individuals are both afraid or discouraged from going to the hospital.

These deaths could also be characterised as being COVID associated, however that is solely as a result of they’ve been falsely lumped into that class attributable to false positives being recorded inside 28 days of demise.

Once more, persons are being examined very frequently, and the speed of false positives is extraordinarily excessive. All hospital sufferers are additionally examined upon admission, so after they die — whatever the trigger — they’re more likely to have a false constructive on their report, which then lumps them into the demise tally for COVID-19.

“The longer you keep in hospital, the extra seemingly you might be to die, clearly,” Yeadon says. “You’d be launched in the event you had been effectively and bettering. So … long-stay sufferers are each extra more likely to die statistically, and way more more likely to be examined so typically that they’re going to have a false constructive check.

That’s what I feel is occurring … It is a comfort for somebody enjoying some macabre sport, as a result of I do not suppose it is an error anymore … I’ve spoken to individuals in [public health] they usually’re embarrassed that they are not even being allowed to characterize and publish the data you would want to know to work out how helpful the check is. That is not being finished.”

Can You Get Reinfected?

Yeadon additionally says he is “sick and drained” of individuals claiming that immunity in opposition to SARS-CoV-2 could wane after a short while, leaving you susceptible to reinfection. For those who’ve been sick with COVID-19 and recuperate, you should have antibodies in opposition to the virus, and you can be immune, he says.

He understands that journalists could get this incorrect, or could also be given incorrect data, but when a scientist says this, “they’re mendacity to you,” he says. Yeadon categorically denies the premise that you’ll be able to recuperate from COVID-19 and later get reinfected and expertise extreme sickness once more.

In keeping with Yeadon, there are solely two methods by which COVID-19 wouldn’t present lasting immunity. The primary could be if it destroys your immune system. The HIV virus, for instance, which causes AIDS, disarms your immune system, inflicting everlasting impairment. Therefore you don’t turn into proof against the HIV virus. Coronaviruses don’t do this.

The second manner is that if the virus mutates, which is frequent amongst influenza viruses. If the virus mutates, your immune system could not absolutely acknowledge it and must mount a protection once more, thereby creating one other set of antibodies. Nevertheless, coronaviruses are genetically steady, Yeadon says.

(For transparency, there have been reviews of SARS-CoV-2 mutating,1 so it is not unattainable that some individuals may get reinfected with a barely mutated model of the virus that may make them sick once more.) 

Hidden Agenda in Plain Sight

As famous by Yeadon, individuals are actually altering the legal guidelines of immunology, which merely should not occur. This shouldn’t be a political difficulty, however someway it’s being handled as one. He claims to don’t have any concepts in any respect as to why these false narratives are being created, and why scientific reality that contradicts the mainstream narrative is being censored.

Others, nevertheless, have turn into extra outspoken about this difficulty, declaring how the pandemic is getting used as a handy excuse and justification for redistribution of wealth and the technocratic takeover of the entire world below the banner of a Great Reset to a “extra equitable” social order and greener commerce.

It is getting used to usher in social modifications that merely might by no means be launched with out some form of calamity, be it warfare or a organic menace, as a result of they contain a radical limitation of non-public freedoms and the elimination of privateness. These answerable for pandemic response measures additionally refuse to bear in mind the value of those measures.

When making public well being choices, you could calculate the fee by way of lives saved and the value in {dollars} and cents of saving these individuals, in opposition to the price of not implementing the measure in query. This isn’t being finished. The query is why is such an illogical stance being taken?

Yeadon on Vaccination

Towards the tip of the interview, Yeadon addresses the difficulty of COVID-19 vaccination. Many are nervous about it changing into necessary, and rightfully so. Vaccine passports are already being rolled out, and all the symptoms level to vaccination changing into a requirement for journey, even perhaps inside nationwide borders.

Having spent his profession within the pharmaceutical trade, Yeadon absolutely helps vaccination, believing they stop giant numbers of deaths. Nevertheless, with regards to SARS-CoV-2, he believes the vaccine will solely profit the aged. For these over 80, a vaccine may give them a few extra months of life.

“No person else wants this [vaccine],” he says. “You do not vaccinate a inhabitants as a result of 1 in 1 million may need a foul end result [from the infection].” He additionally strongly believes the vaccine have to be voluntary:

It is an appalling … public platform to counsel that the one manner we get our lives again is to mass vaccinate the inhabitants. One thing very smelly is happening. It is merely not acceptable. I do not even suppose it will work.”

In an open letter to the British well being minister, Yeadon wrote:2

I’ve learn the session doc. I’ve not often been as shocked and upset. All vaccines in opposition to the SARS-COV-2 virus are by definition novel. No candidate vaccine has been in improvement for quite a lot of months. If any such vaccine is accredited to be used below any circumstances that aren’t EXPLICITLY experimental, I imagine that recipients are being misled to a prison extent.

That is as a result of there are exactly zero human volunteers for whom there might presumably be quite a lot of months past-dose security data. My concern doesn’t come up as a result of I’ve destructive views about vaccines (I do not).

As a substitute, it is the very precept that politicians appear able to waive that new medical interventions at this, incomplete state of improvement, shouldn’t be made obtainable to topics on something aside from an explicitly experimental foundation. That is my concern.

And the cause for that concern is that it isn’t identified what the protection profile will be, six months or a yr or longer after dosing. You will have actually no knowledge on this and neither does anybody else.

It is not that I am saying that unacceptable adversarial results will emerge after longer intervals after dosing. No: it’s that you haven’t any thought what is going to occur but, regardless of this, you will be creating the impression that you just do …

do not belief you. You have not been simple and have behaved appallingly all through this disaster. You are still doing it now, deceptive about an infection threat from younger youngsters. Why ought to I imagine you in relation to experimental vaccines?”

What Can You Do?

In his interview with Brees, Yeadon suggests medical professionals, particularly those that are members of an expert society, who disagree with additional pandemic measures — based mostly on the medical details — write an open letter to the federal government, urging them to talk to and heed the suggestions from impartial consultants.

Arm your self with mortality statistics and the details on PCR testing, so you’ll be able to clarify how and why this pandemic merely is not a pandemic anymore. Firstly, there are not any extra deaths. The identical variety of individuals have died this yr that, on common, have died in earlier years. This merely would not be the case if we had a deadly pandemic.

Second, the PCR check just isn’t a legitimate diagnostic instrument and shouldn’t be finished on the size we’re now doing it. The excessive price of false positives is simply fodder for unnecessary fearmongering. “Folks ought to demand to know what [the false positive] price is,” Yeadon says.

Moreover, “testing people who find themselves effectively — it is only a madcap factor,” he says. Nearly nobody who’s asymptomatic has the dwell virus, however whenever you run the check at a cycle threshold over 30, which means you amplify the viral RNA greater than 30 instances, you find yourself with a constructive check even when the virus is inactive and noninfectious.

“Let’s get again to the details,” Yeadon says. “There are not any extra deaths. However that is not what you hear from the BBC now, is it? I am by no means going to belief the BBC once more, by the way in which. I’ve watched BBC for 41 years. [They’re] by no means coming again into my ears, as a result of they’ve lied in my face all yr … There is a fraud happening …

You are strolling into voluntary home arrest when there are not any extra deaths. Why are you doing that? Severely? … I am fearful, as a result of it would not make any sense and there are not any benign outcomes.”

Get Organized

It is easy to get so confused you could no longer suppose straight nowadays. As defined by Dr. Peter Breggin, featured in “Psychiatrist Blows the Whistle on Pandemic Fearmongering,” whenever you add uncertainty to worry you find yourself with nervousness, a state by which you can not suppose logically.

If this is applicable to you, I urge you to show off mainstream media information and switch to impartial consultants, similar to Yeadon. Do the analysis. Learn via the science. Reorient your self to the details and switch off the propaganda. Subsequent, be part of a gaggle in an effort to have assist.

A lot of teams have fashioned all over the world that are actually rising up in opposition to masks mandates, necessary vaccinations and lockdowns. Just a few examples of such teams embrace:

  • Us for Them, a gaggle campaigning for reopening colleges and defending youngsters’s rights within the U.Ok.
  • Keep Britain Free
  • The COVID Restoration Group (CRG), based by 50 conservative British MPs to struggle lockdown restrictions3
  • Within the U.S., a staff of attorneys, medical doctors, enterprise house owners and fogeys began the Freedom to Breathe Agency, which is combating to guard freedom and liberty

Extra sources of knowledge and teams combating for reality and transparency which might be price testing embrace:

  • The Great Barrington Declaration,4 which requires an finish to lockdowns. As of November 18, 2020, it had been signed by 34,973 medical practitioners, 12,070 medical and public well being scientists, and 634,838 involved residents5
  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s The Defender, a brand new e-newsletter that publishes “banned” information
  • The German COVID-19 Further-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee (, which is launching a world class-action lawsuit in opposition to a protracted record of authorities over the worldwide pandemic response
  • In Spain, greater than 600 medical doctors have fashioned Docs for the Fact (Medicos por la verdad)
  • Within the U.S., medical doctors have fashioned a gaggle known as America’s Frontline Doctors, which is combating to make hydroxychloroquine obtainable throughout the nation

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *