Within the video presentation above, Dr. Peter McCullough, a extremely credentialed and revealed heart specialist, internist and epidemiologist, and one of many main physicians main the cost to offer commonsense scientific knowledge into COVID remedies, explains what the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is and the way it harms human biology — whether or not it comes from a pure SARS-CoV-2 an infection or a COVID jab.
The presentation was given on the Burleson, Texas, COVID Symposium: A Authorized Perspective, which streamed dwell December 3, 2021. He begins by addressing the need for security every time a brand new biologic product is launched. Security will not be one thing we will merely ignore, it doesn’t matter what else is at stake. We should demand that no matter we’re given truly meets some sort of security normal.
Warning bells began ringing in McCullough’s ears in the summertime of 2020, lengthy earlier than the COVID photographs have been rolled out. “I used to be telling lawmakers that we’ve acquired an issue,” McCullough says, as a result of corners have been being minimize which may end in a harmful product. Security research, for instance, have been truncated right down to a mere two months, which doesn’t enable for sufficient analysis.
Why Did They Use Spike Protein?
He additionally had a number of different issues in regards to the growth program. Notably, the photographs have been primarily based on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, which by then we already realized is essentially the most pathogenic a part of the virus, liable for the worst signs of COVID-19, such because the irregular blood clotting seen in severely ailing sufferers.
As defined by McCullough, the virus may be illustrated as a ball with spike-like protrusions on its floor. These spikes are what’s inflicting the issues.
“They’d been genetically altered and engineered in a lab in Wuhan, China” McCullough says, “to be significantly infectious, and to be significantly harmful after they get into the human physique.
The very last thing you need in your physique is a kind of [spike proteins], not to mention billions of them as a result of [they] injury the mind, they injury the guts, they injury bone marrow, they will tear up platelets and crimson blood cells. Very importantly, they injury blood vessels and trigger blood clotting.”
Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA photographs, and Janssen’s vector DNA shot, all inject genetic materials into your physique that packages your cells to start out producing the spike protein. They’re gene switch applied sciences.
In brief, the photographs instruct your physique to supply a harmful protein inside its personal tissues. “We’ve by no means executed that earlier than within the historical past of medication,” McCullough says, and for good purpose: It’s a nasty thought. “It’s nearly like a science fiction story going unhealthy,” he says.
The concept is that by making your physique produce this damaging spike protein, your physique will react and battle it off, thereby creating immunity. Nevertheless, within the course of, the spike protein can do near-incomprehensible injury. In some folks, the spike protein is deadly.
Uncontrolled Spike Protein Manufacturing
What’s extra, we now have uncontrolled manufacturing of spike protein, each by way of amount and time. The Could 2021 paper,1 “Circulating SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Antigen Detected within the Plasma of mRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients,” proved the spike protein circulated within the blood stream for a mean of 15 days’ post-injection. The longest was 29 days.
This refuted the declare that the mRNA merely stayed within the arm and didn’t flow into out of the injection website. Logically, that declare doesn’t make a lot sense, and the Japanese authorities, early on, demanded Pfizer do a research to point out them the place the injected mRNA truly goes.
Pfizer did that biodistribution research,2 which confirmed each the mRNA and spike protein have been extensively distributed in animals’ our bodies. Specifically, it was discovered to build up within the ovaries. Regardless of that, the Pfizer biodistribution information bundle reveals reproductive toxicology research have been eradicated within the curiosity of velocity.
June 25, 2021, a paper was posted on the preprint server BioRxiv, exhibiting the S1 portion of the spike protein stays detectable for as much as 15 months after you recuperate from COVID-19.
“No marvel folks have long-COVID syndrome,” McCullough says. “The physique is attempting to wash out this spike protein that’s not purported to be there, 15 months after you’ve had the an infection.”
McCullough factors out that Bruce Patterson, the Stanford scientist who led that research, additionally continues to search out the entire spike protein — each the S1 and S2 segments — in sufferers who acquired the COVID jab, months post-injection.
So, as of proper now, we don’t know when the spike protein manufacturing ceases. What we do know, with nice certainty, is that the spike protein damages the human physique and contributes to each acute and continual well being situations and illnesses.
Australia has already bought 14 doses of the COVID jabs for each particular person. That is meant to cowl them for seven years, at one dose each six months. As famous by McCullough, some folks merely aren’t going to outlive that sort of steady and ever-increasing onslaught of spike protein.
Pressing Questions on Vaccine Security
Clear hazard indicators have been obvious in April 2021, and Could 24, 2021, McCullough revealed a paper together with 56 different worldwide scientists within the journal Authorea.3
The paper, “SARS-CoV-2 Mass Vaccination: Pressing Questions on Vaccine Security that Demand Solutions from Worldwide Well being Companies, Regulatory Authorities, Governments and Vaccine Builders,” demanded the injections be pulled from the market except or till security issues are addressed. Key scientific issues raised embrace:
The doubtless hazardous mechanisms of motion of the photographs leading to cell, tissue and organ injury
The presence of dangerous spike protein in donated blood
Lack of genotoxicity, teratogenicity and oncogenicity research
The results of bioaccumulation in girls’s ovaries
The potential for lowered fertility
The shortage of an information and security monitoring board (DSMB) to supervise scientific trials and post-market surveillance
The shortage of human ethics committee to supervise scientific trials
The shortage of restrictions on exempted teams from randomized managed trials (RCTs) reminiscent of pregnant girls, girls of childbearing potential, COVID survivors (beforehand immune)
The shortage of danger stratification for hospitalization and loss of life within the scientific trials
The shortage of knowledge transparency
The shortage of public danger mitigation (early and at-home remedy choices)
The paper was despatched to each well being and regulatory company on the earth. Right here we’re in early 2022 and, nicely, you possibly can see what the response was. It’s been nonexistent.
A Crucial Appraisal of VAERS
In October 2021, Jessica Rose, Ph.D., with the Institute for Pure and Utilized Information in Israel, revealed a report within the Science, Public Well being Coverage, and the Legislation journal.4 The report, “Crucial Appraisal of VAERS Pharmacovigilance: Is the US Vaccine Adversarial Occasion Reporting System (VAERS) a Functioning Pharmacovigilance System?” particulars three main issues discovered:
- Deleted hostile occasion studies involving COVID jab accidents
- Delayed entry of studies
- Recoding of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Actions (MeDRA) phrases from extreme to delicate
It additionally contains bar plots exhibiting the acute distinction between the COVID photographs in comparison with all different vaccines available on the market. If the photographs have been secure, the variety of VAERS studies would stay comparatively regular, not various a lot from earlier years, however what we see is a staggering spike in vaccine accidents reported in 2021.
The common variety of hostile occasion studies following vaccination for the previous 10 years has been about 39,000 yearly, with a mean of 155 deaths. That’s for all obtainable vaccines mixed.
The COVID jabs alone now account for 701,126 hostile occasions in U.S. territories as of December 17, 2021, together with 9,476 deaths. In case you embrace worldwide studies that make their manner into the VAERS system, we’re 983,756 hostile occasion studies and 20,622 deaths.5
As staggering as these numbers are, they’re simply the tip of the iceberg. While you add within the underreporting issue, which is believed to be wherever from 5 to 40, the numbers are merely astronomical.
VAERS is an early warning system and is meant to alert our authorities to doubtlessly hazardous vaccines as soon as they’ve been rolled out. The sign from VAERS is so clear there’s merely little doubt we now have a security downside on our fingers.
Can COVID Pictures Trigger Loss of life?
As famous by McCullough, there’s a really tight temporality to the photographs in most deaths. Half have occurred inside 48 hours of injection, and 80% have died inside one week of their jab (be it the primary, second or third dose).6
Temporality is among the 10 Bradford Hill standards used to determine causal relationship. In an effort to be causative, one occasion should happen earlier than one other, and the shorter the length between the 2 occasions, the upper the chance of a causative impact.
In June 2021, Scott McLachlan, Ph.D., on the College of London revealed an evaluation7 of VAERS loss of life studies concluding that 86% of post-jab deaths could possibly be attributed to the photographs. There was no different rationalization for the deaths. McLachlan additionally checked out who’s getting killed by the photographs and, sadly, it’s the identical folks the photographs are supposed to guard — our seniors.
In September 2021, Ronald Kostoff, Ph.D., revealed a report8 that additionally confirmed seniors have been dying from the jab at far increased charges than different age teams. As famous by McCullough, this makes good sense as a result of folks die from COVID-19 because of the influence of the spike protein. Why would anybody assume they may survive having it produced in their very own our bodies?
Utilizing the best-case situation cost-benefit evaluation, Kostoff estimates that folks aged 65 and older are 5 occasions extra prone to die of the COVID shot than from COVID-19 itself.
The explanation for it’s because when you take the shot, you’re assured to be uncovered to its dangers, however you’re not assured to get COVID-19 when you don’t take the shot. It’s possible you’ll be uncovered, or chances are you’ll not. And never everybody develops a extreme an infection even when immediately uncovered.
COVID Jab-Related Myocarditis in Kids
In early September 2021, Tracy Beth Hoeg and colleagues posted an evaluation9 of VAERS information on the preprint server medRxiv, exhibiting that greater than 86% of the youngsters aged 12 to 17 who reported signs of myocarditis have been extreme sufficient to require hospitalization.
Additionally they concluded that wholesome boys have a “significantly increased” likelihood of being hospitalized with myocarditis post-jab than they’re of requiring hospitalization for COVID-19.
In response to McCullough, the FDA has heard these information twice in 2021 and by no means disputed them. But they’ve proceeded with suggestions to offer the COVID jab to anybody with a pulse over the age of 5. It’s simply stunning. Traditionally, as a rule, we’ve by no means given medicine to folks after they’re extra prone to hurt than present a profit.
What Hoeg et. al.10 confirmed is that circumstances of myocarditis explode after the second shot, and disproportionally have an effect on boys. A full 90% of post-jab myocarditis studies are males, and 85% of studies occurred after the second dose. In response to Hoeg et. al.:11
“The estimated incidence of CAEs [cardiac adverse events] amongst boys aged 12-15 years following the second dose was 162 per million; the incidence amongst boys aged 16-17 years was 94 per million. The estimated incidence of CAEs amongst ladies was 13 per million in each age teams.
The incidence of CAEs was significantly decrease after the primary dose throughout all age and intercourse teams. Median peak troponin was 5.2 ng/mL amongst boys aged 12-15 years, 11.6 ng/mL amongst boys aged 16-17 years, 0.8 ng/mL amongst ladies aged 12-15 years, and seven.3 ng/mL amongst ladies aged 16-17 years.”
Troponin Ranges Reveal Large Coronary heart Injury
Troponin is a protein that helps regulate contractions of your coronary heart and skeletal muscle groups. It’s a biomarker for coronary heart injury, as your coronary heart releases troponin in response to an harm. Elevated troponin is used to evaluate whether or not you’ve had a coronary heart assault, for instance.
Regular troponin ranges are almost undetectable, so even small will increase can point out coronary heart injury. A stage above 0.4 ng/mL is usually indicative of a coronary heart assault and something between 0.04 ng/mL and 0.4 ng/mL signifies there’s some sort of downside with the guts.12
So, the sky excessive post-jab troponin ranges in these adolescent boys is something however inconsequential. It will probably completely be life-threatening. Myocarditis may end up in sudden loss of life, as illustrated in an October 2021 case report13 from Korea, the place the loss of life of a 22-year-old man from acute myocarditis was causally linked to the Pfizer shot.
“No doubt, it’s going to kill youngsters,” McCullough says. Even when not acutely deadly, myocarditis can considerably decrease your life expectancy. Traditionally, the three- to five-year survival price for myocarditis has ranged from 56% to 83%.14 Meaning a sure proportion don’t make it previous 5 years as a result of their coronary heart is just too broken.
McCullough and Rose have additionally tried to publish an evaluation on this matter. They submitted a paper15 on myocarditis circumstances in VAERS following the COVID jabs to the journal Present Issues in Cardiology. However after initially accepting the paper, the journal abruptly modified its thoughts.
You may nonetheless find the pre-proof on Rose’s website although. What they present is that post-jab myocarditis is inversely correlated to age, so the danger will get increased the youthful you might be. They too discovered there’s a dose-dependent danger, with boys having a six-fold higher danger of myocarditis following the second dose.
Mortality in Adolescents Is Skyrocketing
McCullough’s assertion that the shot will kill some kids can be beginning to present in statistics. British information, for instance, exhibits deaths amongst youngsters have spiked since that age group turned eligible for the COVID photographs.16
Between the week ending June 26 and the week ending September 18, 2020, 148 deaths have been reported amongst 15- to 19-year-olds. Throughout that very same time interval in 2021, 217 deaths occurred in that age group. That’s a rise of 47%, which has but to be defined.
Deaths from COVID-19 additionally went up amongst 15- to 19-year-olds after the photographs have been rolled out. Vital issues have been raised in regards to the risk that COVID jabs would possibly worsen COVID-19 illness by way of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).17 Is that what’s happening right here? As reported by The Exposé, which carried out the investigation:18
“Correlation doesn’t equal causation, however this can be very regarding to see that deaths have elevated by 47% amongst teenagers over the age of 15, and COVID-19 deaths have additionally elevated amongst this age group since they began receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, and it’s maybe one coincidence too far.”
COVID Jabs Double Threat of Acute Coronary Syndrome
Except for troponin ranges, researchers have additionally discovered Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 photographs dramatically improve different biomarkers related to thrombosis, cardiomyopathy and different vascular occasions following injection.19
Individuals who had obtained two doses of the mRNA jab greater than doubled their five-year danger of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), the researchers discovered, driving it from a mean of 11% to 25%. ACS is an umbrella time period that features not solely coronary heart assaults, but in addition a variety of different situations involving abruptly lowered blood circulation to your coronary heart.
In Months, the Jabs’ Effectiveness Wanes to Zero
As needs to be evident by now, there are important dangers to those COVID photographs. However what in regards to the profit aspect of the equation? As famous by McCullough, whereas the photographs cut back the danger of loss of life from COVID-19, the profit is vanishingly small.
Numerous papers have been revealed calculating absolutely the danger discount of the photographs, exhibiting the 4 obtainable COVID jabs within the U.S. present an absolute danger discount between simply 0.7% and 1.3%.20,21
McCullough goes on to quote a December 1, 2021, New England Journal of Medication research22 that in contrast the effectiveness of Pfizer’s and Moderna’s injections amongst hospitalized veterans. Right here too, they discovered that the photographs had an effectiveness of lower than 1% towards all COVID-19 occasions, over the course of six months.
As of the tip of October 2021, we had 22 research exhibiting the photographs’ efficacy towards all variants quickly wane over the course of three to 6 months, ultimately hitting zero.
For instance, a Swedish research23 revealed October 25, 2021, checked out information from 842,974 pairs, the place every one who had obtained two COVID jabs was paired and in contrast towards an unvaccinated particular person, to see if the vaccinated had fewer symptomatic circumstances and hospitalizations.
Early on, the double-jabbed appeared to have first rate safety, however that shortly modified. The Pfizer jab went from 92% effectiveness at Day 15 via 30, to 47% at Day 121 via 180, and 0 from Day 201 onward. The Moderna shot had the same trajectory, being estimated at 59% from Day 181 onward.
The AstraZeneca injection had a decrease effectiveness out of the gate, waned sooner than the mRNA photographs, and had no detectable effectiveness as of Day 121. All of the whereas, tens of millions of Individuals have already had COVID24 and have pure immunity that doesn’t wane on this method.
“Vaccines aren’t viable if they will’t final a 12 months!” McCullough exclaims. “The minimal standards to just accept a vaccine … is 50% protection and it should final one 12 months. These [COVID shots] aren’t reducing it. None of them are viable to be business merchandise.”
The COVID-Jabbed Are Simply as Infectious because the Unvaccinated
COVID jab mandates are much more irrational while you take into consideration the truth that they don’t forestall you from being contaminated, and research have repeatedly proven that when you’re contaminated, you will have the identical or increased viral load as unvaccinated people. What meaning is you’re simply as infectious as an unvaccinated particular person.
What’s extra, as famous in a letter25 to the editor of The New England Journal of Medication, the photographs even have solely minor affect on viral clearance. In case you get the COVID shot and are available down with COVID, you may be sick for a day or so lower than somebody who’s unvaccinated.
We Should Deal with COVID Sufferers Early
McCullough closes out his presentation going over the all-important challenge of early remedy. It’s essential deal with COVID early and aggressively. You additionally have to hit it from a number of sides. No single drug can successfully deal with all elements of this an infection (though the Omicron variant doesn’t seem to have any of the blood clotting and low oxygen points related to the earliest strains).
Only a few folks want die from COVID so long as they get applicable remedy early sufficient. The truth that our well being authorities are to this present day refusing to acknowledge profitable remedy protocols is nothing wanting a criminal offense.
If you wish to dwell, and if you would like your loved ones and pals to dwell, you’d be sensible to disregard the CDC’s and FDA’s advice to attend till you possibly can’t breathe after which go to the hospital, the place they’ll offer you poisonous remdesivir and deadly air flow. As a substitute, arm your self with a number of early remedy protocols and be sure to have the fundamentals in your medication cupboard. Protocols you should utilize embrace:
- The Entrance Line COVID-19 Crucial Care Alliance’s (FLCCC’s) prevention and early at-home treatment protocol. Additionally they have an in-hospital protocol and long-term management guidance for long-haul COVID-19 syndrome. Yow will discover a list of docs who can prescribe ivermectin and different vital medicines on the FLCCC website
- The AAPS protocol
- Tess Laurie’s World Council for Health protocol
- America’s Frontline Doctors
I reviewed all of those protocols and consider the FLCCC’s is the simplest and only. I’ve posted a abstract of it beneath. Nevertheless, I’ve altered a number of the suggestions. Particularly, I like to recommend:
Reducing zinc dose from 100 mg to 50 mg elemental zinc, however just for three days, then lower to fifteen mg elemental zinc.
Rising quercetin from 250 mg to 500 mg.
Add NAC to 500 mg per day.
When utilizing vitamin C, I like to recommend liposomal vitamin C, 1,000 to 2,000 mg, 4 to 6 occasions per day.
When utilizing honey, be sure it’s uncooked, not regular honey from the grocery retailer. Uncooked honey may be obtained on-line or at a well being meals retailer.
Add fibrinolytic enzymes like lumbrokinase, serrapeptidase or nattokinase, two to 4 tablets, two to a few occasions a day, on an empty abdomen (one hour earlier than or two hours after a meal). This may assist break down any microclots and can be utilized in lieu of aspirin.
I’ve additionally added a few therapies that they’ve but to incorporate:
- Nebulized hydrogen peroxide — Nebulize 5 ml of 0.1% peroxide dissolved in 0.9% regular saline each hour or two. It’s finest to make use of a nebulizer that plugs into the wall, as these are simpler than battery operated ones.
- Intravenous ozone administered by a educated ozone doctor.